One evening very early in my relationship with Kelley, we were having dinner at a suburban Atlanta Ruby Tuesday’s (hey, it’s all we could afford: mahi mahi, baked potato and one glass each of white zinfandel, once a month, and we by-god enjoyed it) when I stopped, fork halfway to my mouth, and said, ‘Huh, look, two more dykes in Duluth!’ She turned and looked at the women who had walked in. ‘How can you tell?’ she asked.
I stared at her, stumped. How could she not tell? To me, they may as well have had SCREAMING DYKE!! tattooed on their foreheads in flourescent purple. To me it’s very, very obvious when a person is queer. Many people disagree, especially when it comes to women. Oh, they say, yes, you can tell with gay men, but women are more fluid. Bullshit. You can tell. I can always tell. (Though sometimes I know someone is a dyke before she’s figured it out–and sometimes they’re just not brave enough to ever figure it out. But I see the potential stamped on their faces, in their body language, buried in their smell and the tone of their voice.) Kelley’s own dykedar is now active and fine-tuned but there’s one woman we still disagree about–but, hey, I know I’m right. I know.
So imagine my delight when I came across this in Rainbow Zine:
Last year, Tufts University psychologist Nicholas Rule raised a few eyebrows when he published a study suggesting a man’s sexual orientation can be “accurately and rapidly perceived” simply by looking at his face. Now, a follow-up study finds female faces are equally transparent in conveying which gender turns them on.
“Sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly and automatically from women’s faces,” Rule and his colleagues write in the latest issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. “Deliberation and thinking too much seems to disrupt this ability.”
(thanks, Cindy)
Apparently some people can just tell instantly, even from tightly cropped photos of the eyes. Ha! The trick is to not stop and think about it. There again, that’s the trick to most of life. Just do it.
Wow, how about that? I've always been pretty crappy at the dykedar thing myself. I didn't believe in it at first, until I met people who always seem to know. I have gotten a little better over the years. I guess I'm still learning. But I'm also crappy at those tests for reading quick facial expressions. I think I could learn to do better with practice.
I knew it. There are some people, one look is all it takes. “”Uh huh – Lezzer/Queen/Poor thing doesn't even know it yet.”
I have never ever had working gaydar. Not ever. I can't tell a gal is gay unless she dresses like a lumberjack and plants one on me. Seriously. I think I'm broken. =)
I'm pretty terrible at it; but I'm also an indiscriminate flirt. I think it works against me on this.
Oh, and I have to say that people used to say they could tell I was a lesbian before I ever identified myself that way. Really pissed me off. It's my reality thank you very much. :) Maybe they are actually bi or something and you are getting your signals mixed up? Have they done any studies for bidar?
jennifer, I don't discriminate between dyke and bi; both = potential opportunity. Y'know, if I thought that way…
Ah, yes. Well that opens up some doors Down with discrimination. Potential. What's not to love about potential?
I've always wondered if anyone else had the gaydar. Makes me feel tingly all over. :)
“…there's one woman we disagree about.”
What is it that makes you disagree?
I think she's open to women–or would be to the right woman. K thinks I'm on crack.
I know I'm right…
:]