From lippenheimer, a thoughtful review of Slow River, pondering the consequences of straight/queer equality:
One of the main questions that classic feminist sci-fi explored was whether, if women had power and autonomy, they would create a world radically different from and better than the one we’ve got (a common means of getting this autonomy was the elimination of men, or escape from them, which is a depressing commentary on how bad things were in the real world). I suppose one could ask the same question about GLBT people, and in both cases, Griffith’s answer seems to be fairly negative, that both groups, being born into a world with a tradition of exploitation and violence, are liable to perpetuate those traditions.
Ammonite deliberately asked and answered “Are women human?” (I was so very tired of watching f/sf writers struggle with this ‘question’. Ammonite was designed to end the debate.)
I hadn’t thought about it in these terms before but apparently Slow River asks “Are queers human?” That wasn’t my intent with the book . To me the main questions in the book are: “What makes us who we are? How far outside our normal behaviour will we go to stay alive? How do we come back? What makes two people who seem to be in the same situation respond so differently?” But I can see how some readers might use this set-up to consider the wider question, “Are queers human?” To me, the answer is perfectly obvious.
You?
Nicola Griffith 
This reminded me of the John Prine song, “Some Humans Ain't Human” – I mean, really, how long do we have to answer this question? (That is rhetorical :P)
jill, I was surprised. But it's interesting to ponder looking at it that way. But, eh, I'm interested in almost anything to do with others' responses to my work.
I'm sorry if I seemed to be asking “Are queer people human?” That sounds awfully arrogant–I had more in mind the idea that _Slow River_ seems to embody a world where queer people are not immediately categorized and separated from other people, and I wondered whether such a world would represent a loss as well as a gain for queer people themselves.
lippenheimer, I found it an interesting way to look at the book. I'm not complaining!
To to address your intended question: once we are all equal, legally and culturally, those of us who are brave will continue to be as different as we wish to be. Those of us who aren't, won't. Difference can be costly. Personally, I'm looking forward to actually having a choice.
N. They must be. I love a bunch of them. Ok, maybe me loving something isn't the litmus test. But who in their right mind ( no pun intended) would even ask that question? Is my son human? Is his husband human. I have a better question: Is Dick Cheney human?
Sorry. Hot button. Calm, calm.