I can only assume you’ve been asked this many times, so I apologize up front. But, are you planning another adventure for Aud? I miss her terribly. Thank you.
You’re right, I’ve been asked this question a million times. I try to never say never, but the odds of me writing another Aud book anytime soon are slim. I love Aud, love being in her head, but I’m so wrapped up in my current work–about a woman of the seventh century, Hild–that I just can’t imagine pulling away long enough to get back to Aud.
Plus there are other reasons. I explain some of the more personal in my interview with Cobalt:
I gave Aud a love interest who is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis late in [Always]. When I realised where it was going I nearly stopped working on the book.
I hate having MS (no one in their right mind would enjoy it). It already takes up too much space in my life. I most certainly didn’t want it taking up all the air in my work, too. But that’s what my story brain brought me. I told myself that, just as Aud’s grief wasn’t my grief, was different in many respects, Aud’s love’s MS was not my MS. I did the work.
Always is where the story stops, for now. There are several reasons for calling a temporary halt–I’ll talk about the main one later–but one is certainly that to go on would mean having to examine what it’s like to love someone with MS. I’d have to dissect how it might be for my partner, Kelley, to love me. I’d be spending my entire artistic life dwelling on a disease I loathe in order to separate reality from fiction. And, in the end, no matter what I said in the Author’s Note, half my readers would secretly believe the novel was about me.
(There’s more about Aud–and many other things–in that interview. Read it here.)
But there are brutally practical publishing reasons, too. All three Aud books came from–and are still available from–different publishers (The Blue Place is Perennial, Stay is Vintage, Always is Riverhead). For a series, this is impractical at best and career death at worst. They look different; they were sold differently; readers had–still have–no clue that each book was part of something greater. Until this changes, trying to sell a fourth would be madness. I hope one day to buy back the rights to those three books and publish them coherently, as they deserve, with unified jackets, marketing, and so on. If I do that, it’s entirely possible that I will feel motivated to write a fourth. (I have books four and five roughed out in my head.) So, yes, while one day there might be more Aud it won’t be for quite a while.
Well once Hild sells a zillion copies, your publisher can make outrageous offers to buy the rights to your backlist & repackage it! Hooray!
Amen to that. I just came back from Amsterdam and saw hundreds of possible Auds for the film, after you get the books back of course. Hang in there N., we love ya.
I haven't had the time to read to cobalt interview yet (will do); however, since this post addresses two of my most burning questions I just needed to leave a comment. or two:
1) i always wondered why the three aud stories came from different publishing houses? it breaks my heart to hear that this is one of the reasons there won't be a new aud novel anytime soon….
2) now that you've outlined your personal reasons for the lack of “enthusiasm” about the next sequel I absolutely get it. as much as i enjoy reading this blog and, in general, stuff about you and your work (interviews etc.) i regret i ever “looked you up” on the internet. (is that proper english?) i hope you won't take this the wrong way: you're a fascinating author and all your giving us, the audience, is great. but it biases my very personal imagination of that character. as a reader you simply can't help looking for parallels between the protagonist and the author, no matter how hard you try. sometimes, it's not even “parallels”, it's simply the author's perception of the character that's not congruent with yours. and that's…. aaaah… let's stick to the term “bias”.
nonetheless, thanks for letting us know. as i said, i totally get it even though…. well… i'd love to hold another of those books sometimes soon in my hands.
Kate
That's pretty much the plan :)
Ah, Amsterdam, full of strapping lasses. Must visit there again soon…
Kate, I hear you on the author vs. voice of the novel issue. I have very mixed feelings about it when it comes to my own reading. But in the end I always opt for knowing more. Human curiosity I suppose.
As for question 1, I think I'll answer that in its own blog post sometime next week. It's a longish story…
human curiosity, definitively! that said, the extent to which i look up authors varies a lot – for a good reason. there was this sequel of mystery novels i really loved, adored the heroine etc. etc. then i read about the author and realized i had a huge problem with her political views. and i stopped reading her books. i became aware of all the cues in her writing i had overlooked. it's like in the italian restaurant example in your cobalt interview: you see the world trough your own weird little kaleidoscope and sometimes you should leave it at that.
as for q1: i hear many of you guys out there use the kindle so perhaps thinking about the cover is somewhat outdated. but i like my physical copies and, well, there is that tactile element you just can't overlook and you keep wondering…
kate
Books that I know will become favourites I buy in print and digital editions. But (fortunately for my budget) books that good are rare.
following this logic, i need to get a kindle for my three griffith books ;-)
kate
You'll need an ereader of some kind for Hild. It's going to be a big, heavy book…
i'm a little scared of “hild”, i must admit (the length, the setting, the language!!), but i'll definitively give it a try. note on the to-do-list: get an e-reader (with dictionary).
kate
The book is designed to be read easily, lightly, without stress. It is most definitely not intimidating! Besides, there'll be a glossary and map and pronunciation guide, too. No dictionary required.