where did hild come from? i recall aud was first a dream but what was the inspiration for hild?
…maybe a little background to the question: it seems to me that “hild” isn’t like anything you’ve written so far (not that i’ve read all you works…); immersing oneself into 7th century britain is like earning a phd so where on earth did the motivation for something like this come from? it made me speculate: is it some kind of back (i mean, reeeally far back) to the roots thing? human curiosity strikes again!
This question is taken from comments on a previous post. I’m going to answer in two parts.
The first part is a reposting of the very first piece I put up on my research blog, Gemæcca, four years ago. “History Meme Game” details what is known to be known about Hild, followed by speculation.
Be warned: there are very possibly, depending on how you squint, SPOILERS AHEAD. In the writing of the novel I answered many of the questions discussed, dismissed others, changed the terms of still others, and have not yet got to the rest. But even asking the questions might give you a notion of the shape of the book. Personally, I don’t give a flying fig for spoilers, it’s the actual unfurling of the narrative that matters to me. But I understand mileage varies. So if you’re fanatical about that sort of thing, consider yourself warned.
***
I’m writing a novel about Hild of Whitby, also known as St. Hilda, who lived in seventh century Britain [yes, fourteen hundred years ago]. For about ten years I’ve been researching, on and off, the basics: language, the politics of conversion, food, arms and armour, textile production, etc. The more I learn the more I realise I don’t know. So I started fossicking about online and came across a few early medieval blogs (where I suspect I’ve made a bit of a nuisance of myself). One of the bloggers, Michelle at Heavenfield, has tagged me for a blog game. One is supposed to:
- Link to the person who tagged you.
- List 7 random/weird things about your favorite historical figure.
- Tag seven more people at the end of your blog and link to theirs.
- Let the person know they have been tagged by leaving a note on their blog.
But in order to play, one has to have a blog. So after some thought I’m building this one. I hope lots of people drop by and offer friendly advice, ask interesting questions, or just say hello.
Not much is known about this fascinating woman, and all of it is from Bede–a monk, born in Hild’s lifetime but writing mostly in the early eighth century, that is, within living memory of many of the events he describes.
(From here on, everything in this post in parentheses is speculative, i.e., I made it up.) Hild was born c. 614 CE, after her mother had had a dream about unborn child bringing light to the land (this sounds like a good ploy from a homeless, widowed pregnant woman: don’t hurt me, what I carry is important!). Father: Hereric, of the royal house of Deira (possibly son of Æthelric, king of Deira 599-604 when Æthelfrith killed him), who was killed at the court of Ceredig, king of Elmet just before Hild’s birth. Mother: Breguswith, family unknown (but I’m thinking possibly–per a conversation on Heavenfield–she was a sister of Rædwald, king of East Anglia). Older sister: Hereswith, who married Æthelric, son of Eni–who was brother of King Rædwald–and brother to King Anna; Æthelric was briefly co-king of East Anglia, with Sigiberht, before Anna took the throne. Hild, along with many of Edwin’s household, was baptised by Paulinus c. 627 in York. She then disappears from the record until 647, when after a year in East Anglia she’s about to take ship for Gaul to join the widowed Hereswith in an abbey (Bede says Chelles–but Chelles wasn’t founded until Balthild took the veil, so I think probably Faramoutiers). It’s at this point Aidan, bishop of Lindisfarne (essentially the go-to God Guy for Northumbria, invited from Iona at the behest of Oswald, who is currently king), recruits her to his church, and Hild heads back north. There she spends a year on a plot of land on the R. Wear (I’ve never been wholly convinced of this location, but I don’t have alternative suggestions), where she is essentially being deprogrammed–stripped of worldliness–and retrained as an abbess. Then she is sent to Hartlepool to restore order (Heiu, the previous boss, goes off and founds another house–in/near Tadcaster?). At Hackness Hild does a cracking job and is given a bigger, better abbey, Whitby/Streanæshalch (which she may or may not have founded). Oswald’s brother, Oswiu, now king, sends his infant oblate daughter, Æfflæd, to Whitby. After Oswiu’s death, his widow Eanflæd (Æfflæd’s mother) joins the abbey. At Whitby, Hild trains five bishops, and hosts the Synod where Oswiu rules in favour of Roman practise. She is known as ‘mother’ and is a consultant to kings and princes. She persuades Cædmon, a cowherd, to write the first vernacular poem. She dies November 17 680, attended by the usual hagiographic visions of her soul ascending to heaven, and is declared a saint almost immediately. (She was probably buried at Whitby, and then had her remains translated to Glastonbury some time later.)
Everybody who has read Bede knows all this. So writing seven weird/interesting/obscure facts seems rather pointless. Instead, I’ll write seven things no one knows about Hild (because I made them up–some informed guesses, some wildly speculative, some naked fictionalisation for dramatic purposes).
1) Hild’s real name. Hild is half a name. Her full name could have been almost anything, but I think the two most likely are Hildeburh and Hildeswith. They follow the alliterative H (Hereric, Hereswith). The -with suffix is extremely likely, given Breguswith and Hereswith, but for some reason I don’t like the notion of Hild being Hildeswith. It just doesn’t sound strong enough. So I’m thinking–per Christine Fell–that -burh is better. ‘Hild’ means battle, and I think she lived up to it.
2) The murderer of Hild’s father. I think Edwin did it. He wanted to be king, and was busy forming alliances all over the country (they all went wrong, with a vengeance; clearly, he wasn’t a likeable man)–but so was/did Hereric. So Edwin paid Ceredig of Elmet to remove him , and then used the murder as an excuse to drive Ceredig from the forest and annexe Elmet. (The murder also could have been an early move by Cadwallon–prince and then king of Gwynedd–in the kill-the-foster-brother game that he and Edwin played over decades.)
3) Hild’s husband. Much as I’d rather, for dramatic reasons, she didn’t marry, Hild would definitely have done so. Firstly, all women did. Secondly, she was a valuable game piece in the endless politicking and alliance-forming/-breaking of the 7th C. Thirdly, Bede never refers to her as ‘virgin’. But I can’t decide who Edwin–the man ultimately in charge of her life–would have wanted to hook into his web of allegiance/obligation/hegemony. He already had Mercia (via his wife, Cwenburh–though, again, it went disastrously wrong) and East Anglia (Hereswith) so maybe he tried for a British alliance e.g. Alt Clut. The fact that Bede doesn’t mention Hild’s husband means she married someone beyond the pale–either a pagan, or a British or Irish royal, or someone equally unsuitable for as-yet undisclosed reasons. But who? I’m utterly stumped here. If anyone is willing to speculate, please help.
4) Why Hild preferred the Ionian to the Roman way of doing things. She was baptised by Paulinus (Roman) and recruited by Aidan (Ionian) while waiting, supposedly, to take ship to Faramoutiers (or some other Gaulish abbey) which would have been more Roman than anything. She was hooked into the Gaulish church six ways from Sunday (probably related in some distant way–through her mother, maybe, or at the very least though Hereswith’s marriage–to Balthild) so why didn’t she go over there and run something Roman? Instead, she ran Hackness and Whitby under the aegis of Lindisfarne. And she hosted the Synod of Whitby where the vote (okay, Oswiu didn’t exactly vote, being, y’know, king) went to Rome.
5) What Hild’s role in the early church really was. I think she was a facilitator–my guess is that although Bede doesn’t say so, it was Hild’s influence and presence in the room at Whitby that kept things civilised, that engineered the appointment of an acceptable compromise candidate to Lindisfarne upon Colman’s departure.
6) How well she got on with her family. Hereric died (could have been poisoning–deliberate or accidental–could have been appendicitis, no way to tell) and that death left Hild and her mother and her sister at the mercy of the world. I imagine there was a bit of irrational blame there: you bastard, you left us alone! And then the three women would have to have stuck together to face the world. But mothers and daughters don’t often get along so well after puberty. And Hereswith got the good marriage (at least insofar as we know). There again, Hild was the one who got the from-mummy prophecy about being a light of the world. Also, for dramatic purposes, I’ve given Hild a half-brother, Cian.
7) Why she chose Whitby/Steanæshalch. It has a great harbour, yes, and a high cliff–always good for contemplative-while-seeing-trouble-coming purposes–and there were plenty of Roman roads and old tracks leading to and from busy places. But, still. It’s a long way from York, Bebbanburg, Dùn Èideann etc.
So here are the seven things I’d most like to know about Hild:
1) Why did she spend a year in East Anglia? Did she?
2) Who did she marry, and why? What killed her children–plague? War? Malaria?
3) Why did she choose Whitby/Streanæshalch? Was there already a small church there?
4) What did Whitby look like? Built of wood, yes, but dormitories or huts? How many people lived there? (When will the latest excavation be published?)
5) What was her favourite colour? Yep, sounds trivial, but it’s not. I mean, women of those times would spend about 65% of their days on textile production (cf Penelope Walton Rogers), and when you’re that intimately involved in your own clothes, colour choice is a big deal. Plus there would have been rules–at least customs–about who was allowed to wear what. So what does the granddaughter of a deposed king get to wear? And what colours were possible? (How deep a blue could you get?)
6) What time of year was she born? I think autumn. Why? Well, Old English poetry reeks of elegy, and the most elegaic season is autumn, so I like the notion of making the end of September/beginning of October her particular time.
7) What made her tick? Bede tells us Hild ran her abbeys in orderly fashion, and that everyone called her mother. It makes sense, then, that this was possible because she was reasonable, calm, competent, flexible, able to adjust to the evidence i.e. she’s like a disciplined scientist who sees an odd result and thinks, huh, that’s weird, let’s find out why… I bet she loved the Easter calculus. I bet she loved the inherent mathematics (though she wouldn’t have know that what it was) of the soaring music James the Deacon brough north. I bet she loved Isidore’s attempt to explain and codify the known world in his etymologies (though it’s pretty unlikely she had access to this book; but it’s not impossible, so I think I’ll take some licence). I bet she encountered an abacus at Gipswīc when she accompanied Edwin to East Anglia to sort out Hereswith’s marriage. She was probably an accomplished linguist, speaking British, Anglisc, Irish, and Latin. How else could she be held in such high regard by so many people? She talked to them. She listened. She let them know they had been heard.
- Cloth and Clothing in Early Anglo-Saxon, Penelope Walton Rogers (CBA, 2007)
- A History of the English Church and People (don’t remember which translation I used or who published it but, y’know, it’s Bede–go look it up)
- Women in Anglo-Saxon England, Christine Fell (Blackwell, 1987)
***
Why this lengthy preamble? So that those of you who don’t know how much research I’ve done, and so don’t understand where Kate’s question is coming from, can get a sense of the scope of work. Otherwise my explanations might sound rather pompous and self-congratulatory. Though it might well ending up sounding that way, anyway. Oh, well. We’ll find out tomorrow.
nicola: i was up for a spoiler; i thought hild might stop me from bugging you about aud. :)
i can read anything contemporary (i was going to get peter nadash's “parallel stories” even though in terms of volume this thing really scares me) but i don't read historical novels (i guess that's because i was tortured with 8 years of latin in a european style gymnasium/ grammer school. yeah, i know…).
that said i'm determined to give hild a try so i'm really curious what made you start this (apart from that blog game). i understand you read bede… ok… and then? will find out tomorrow. curious!
cheers,
kate
p.s. for those who don't know (i didn't): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bede
kate, aaargh!! I completely forgot what people do/don't know about Bede (even though this is the second time I've been reminded in the last week). One of the perils of living with this stuff for so long. Anyway, I've added the link. Thank you.
If I've done my job right, reading Hild will be more like reading Aud set long ago than reading most historical novels. I promise there's hardly any Latin.
Who could forget the Venomous Bede?!
He can get a bit waspish.
In general, though, and bearing in mind his bias, I find him much less venomous than other chroniclers (cf Gildas). He set the standard for historiography for a long time.
My own bias is that I sometimes can't fathom the fact that some people don't know about Bede. Those of us of a certain age in the UK absorbed this stuff along with our mothers' milk…
Good to hear all this again, and I'm looking forward to tomorrow.
Kate, have you read AMMONITE and SLOW RIVER? Those are not in present time either, but they are wonderful to read. :)
I've certainly heard of Bede, but he certainly was not part of 'our mothers' milk' or anything close to that where I grew up in a Southern small-town.
Who knows what will catch someone's fancy? It's all good as long as they decide to write about it, if they write like you. You are so picky to get the history so right, and yet so adventurous to describe the human goings on. I appreciate the history, but truly love the human goings on.
Barbara, it's people that make history.
I'm not sure exactly when I first encountered Bede. High school, probably, since I read 1066 & All That as a college freshman and “got” the Venomous/Venerable Bede joke when I read it.
Personally, I remember finding Bede mildly annoying, though I don't recall now exactly why. Certainly he seems the very soul of sweetness if one has been reading Lactantius!
I'll take your word for it; I haven't had the, ah, pleasure of Lactantius.
i guess that's what makes me want to read it; as far as i'm informed, hilda was a nun, a saint (saint hilda) so the parallel between her and aud is not immediately obvious. nonetheless, i see how she could share traits with aud which, back then, was probably revolutionary.
kate
who could forget the venerable? venomous? (help me out here, please!) bede?
well, i've never heard of him before. that's probably because the world extends beyond the anglo-saxon area (hard to believe sometimes, i know)and bede simply isn't part of a normal “high school” curriculum in those other areas. to be exact, we don't even have high schools here. rather… aaaah, to complicated!
kate
i'm about to make a total outcast of myself here: not only haven't i read bede (frankly, i don't give a flying fuck about that guy) but i'm embarrassed to admit that haven't read slow river and ammonite either (i'm staring to feel the wrath of the grupies….outch!:)) . what can i say? i don't read historical novels and i don't read fantasy/sci fi. i had no clue nicola started out as a sci fi writer.
i stumbled across the aud tryptych and got excited about the character for a zillion of very personal reasons. that's how i came across this blog.
i'm a scholar, i read tons of academic papers and everything that goes beyond 30,40 pages (particularly if i have to review it) makes my toes curl. i guess that predisposes me to a) contemporary stuff and b) stuff of reasonable length.
but yeah… slow river is on my to-do-list and, admittedly, just because it's written by nicola i was going to give hild a chance. and: i read a lot of queer stuff so if you have more suggestions for me: shoot!
kate
One of the biggest challenges for me was to create a character who has agency and, therefore, able to carry a novel in ways interesting to a modern reader–without giving her a 21st C sensibility. But I found a way…
If you want to venture into my version of science fiction but stick with something short, why not give my 2-stories-and-a-novella collection, With Her Body, a go? Ebook here. Paper book here.
I can certainly understand not reading Lactantius for pleasure–his Deaths of the Persecutors is gory and poisonous at best. But wouldn't *Hild* have read him? ;-)
–P.
Don't read fantasy/sci fi why? I think you will be pleasantly surprised when you read SL. Nicola's memoir? Great stuff there too.
As for other queer literature, I suggest you run, do not walk, to go buy this: DANGEROUS SPACE
Otherwise, you are going to have a along wait for Hild…. which I'm fairly certain will be another genre-blowing, mind-blowing read. :)
Make that absolutely certain. :)
I doubt it. She was a first-generation convert, and Lactantius wasn't v. popular at that point, I shouldn't think. Not quite in the mainstream of church thought.
ok, thanks for the hints: With Her Body and Dangerous Space are on my list. had a quick look at With Her Body: lovely written!
kate
Enjoy!