I’ve lost count of the number of readers who have suggested I look like one of the protagonists of my books, as illustrated on their covers. The first time it happened was with Slow River. I was surprised, but then came The Blue Place*, and Stay, and I became progressively less surprised. With Hild I expected it.
But I think you’re all on crack: I don’t think I look like any of my protagonists. Lore, for example, is glossy as a racehorse with perfect teeth. Aud is six feet tall with eyes the colour of cement (though I admit we did both have white-blonde hair for a while). Hild has chestnut hair—and is even taller. I don’t see it. But by now I’ve become so used to the confusion that when readers comment on it I smile blandly, say, “I get that a lot,” and move on.
However, at a recent literary festival—the first time for a while I’ve done public Hild stuff—several people mentioned it. And a couple of days ago a reader, Cheryll, asked me if the fact that the painting of Hild looked “exactly like my author photo” was intentional or “just a remarkable coincidence.”
So I’ve decided to approach the question again with an open mind.
First, though, let me be quite clear about one thing: it was not my intent that the Balbussos’ painting of Hild look like me. I didn’t want Hild on the cover at all. I can’t speak to the artists’ intent but I suspect it wasn’t theirs, either. For one thing, if they even saw the author photo, which was shot by Jennifer Durham in January 2013, they must have worked blindingly fast: the cover was ready at the end of February.
Cheryll said:
Look at the eyebrows. Look at the front of the nose and the way the light catches it. Most of all, check out the coolly appraising yet open and curious gaze. Maybe you can’t see the resemblance because you’re comparing what you see in the mirror with the image on the book cover. I and the others who’ve noticed this resemblance are comparing the cover with a photograph. So I think that’s what inspired the Balbussos. Certainly they’d read the book. So perhaps it’s not so much that you look like your protagonist; it’s that they’ve made your protagonist look like (the image of) you.
Yes, in the painting Hild’s eyes and hair colour are as described in the book. But they’re not like mine. I don’t think. It’s actually hard to say what colour my eyes are, exactly; blue, yes, but they tend towards green when I wear green, and grey when I wear grey. (Compare the colours in my two author photos.) My hair colour is quite different. My stylist describes it as “dark blonde” (stylist-speak for “light brown”) and when I was younger it was blonde. Now it’s flecked with grey, and after a few hours in the sun bits can turn gilt-bronze. But chestnut (red-brown)? No.
However, it’s clear that some readers see a resemblance even if I don’t. So I asked Cheryll if that perceived resemblance helped or hindered her connection with Hild while she read. She told me neither—that she hadn’t noticed it until she was halfway through the book and had already formed her opinion.
I was glad about that. I can get irritable when readers of any stripe think my protagonist is just a Mary Sue. I’ve talked about this a bit before, for example in an interview a few years ago for Always:
What’s your relationship to Aud? How does her personality relate to your own? Is she the character in these books who’s most similar to you?
Who is the Mary Sue character? Aud, with her martial arts, foreignness, and self-defence? Yes. Kick, with her size and shape, her MS, her love of food? Yes. Dornan, with his optimistic entrepreneurship, hypothetical questions and love of philosophy? Yes. Else, with her need to change the world and adherence to simple design principle? Yes. Eric, with his cheerful love of wine and fast cars and pop culture? Yes. Corning with her hope she can get away with bending the rules and getting what she wants? Yes. Rusen, with his need to make something good even though he doesn’t really know everything he needs to? Yes.
They’re all me. The more minor the character, the more minor the facet of my own character I’ve chosen and sharpened and polished. I love them all, even the not-so-nice ones.
Aud is a path-not-taken character. I’m not American. I do understand self-defence. I do care about justice. I am practical. I have studie martial arts. I can imagine a universe where I might have ended up a bit like her if I hadn’t fallen in love when I was fifteen, if I were six feet tall and rich and Norwegian and physically able. Kick has MS and small hands; so do I. But she’s American and an ex-stunt actor. And she didn’t run a mile when she met Aud. I think I would have done.
All my fictional characters, major and minor, are infused with me and my experience to some degree. Like the people in our dreams, they have to be: imagination begins in experience. My hope, though, is that they take on their own personality.
To settle the question once and for all (also to continue my quest to learn all of WordPress’s nifty tools) I’ve created a poll. I want you to give your opinion (you will be anonymous to me, so don’t be shy); I’m braced for any result.
* A twist on this with The Blue Place: I also had a zillion readers (well, scores anyway) ask if I had the phone number/email address/name of the woman on the cover. For years I had no idea…and then I did.
This is fascinating. At first, I did not see where people were getting this similarity. I figured it was more from the reader wanting it to be so, and that their emotions were making them see the resemblance. Then last night I read this post, and picked up the paperback of Hild I had at the top of my TBR pile. (been planning to re-read in paper) The paperback version has your author photo on the first page inside the cover. Right in the middle where Hild’s face is on the cover in about the same size. So when you open it, we see you in B&W right behind Hild’s face. And I agree that the expression is similar. The lighting on your face is also similar. Anyone reading the paperback is bound to see it.
I would love to hear what the Balbusso’s would say about how they created the artwork. The lighting on both faces is similar. We have the shading on the right side and some on the left. Your facial structure is similar. Your expression is similar. You both have prominent eyes.
Interesting to me is the faint lightness in the shadow on the right lower cheek. That is something I was trying to avoid. In my photograph (it’s subtle) it’s caused by my fill card/light and the lightness of your neck reflecting back into the shadow. In the Hild portrait, it’s more pronounced and seems out of place to me. It doesn’t match the darkness of her outfit – nothing light to reflect that back. I wonder why they put that there – makes me think they copied something and left that in when it shouldn’t be. Look at the lower part of Hild’s eyes – around 4 o’clock. In real life that would be caused by a light or bright object reflecting back in her eye. The same thing that would cause the lighter part of the cheek shadow. You can see a similar highlight in your eyes only much smaller. That was my fill – so the shadows would not get too dark.
I’m guessing that the Balbusso’s made that up. Their website ways that they study classic pantings, etc. They need these highlights and shadows to create shape, so maybe they just put it there. Or maybe they were looking at a picture that had it. They would have to study all sorts of portraits and people in various light to know how/when to put in those highlights/shadows. Going by what they say on their website, I am guessing they looked at historical paintings imagining what Hild may have looked like. http://goo.gl/s7DtSH
I looked it up, and I sent you the finals of the author photo on 2/13/13. It seems doubtful that they were much influenced by that photo at that late date although they may have seen a proof from the publisher a couple of weeks earlier. It’s a big coincidence in the similarity of the lighting, but maybe not so big when you consider that it’s a classic style of lighting. Photographers also look a great paintings for lighting inspiration. :) So, I think this coincidence in choice of lighting and expression contributed to people thinking you look alike.
I had no idea about that paperback, just hadn’t noticed at all. Thanks for pointing it out.
And thanks for the detailed response. I think the lighting is, as you say, pretty classic–both on the painting and in your photo set-up. I think it must be on the other photos, too: otherwise why would so many readers (right now some/all have chosen a YES version more often than NO)??
Huh.